November 5, 2008

Marriage…Since the “dawn of time”?!

Posted in gender roles, heteronormative, marriage, privilege at 5:17 pm by LB

Since my master’s thesis was on marriage, normative gender roles, and the production of heteronormativity, I very much enjoyed Jon Stewart’s November 3rd commentary on Proposition 8 opponents (even though my own marriage politics is of the Beyond Marriage flavor).

He comedically points out that while those who are against the legalization of same-sex marriage rely on the definition of “traditional marriage” and the way it has “always been,” their arguments, if nothing else, are short term at best.

With traditional marriage, women were property exchanged between their father and their husband, often for the sake of political power, transferring wealth, and keeping the peace. And as Stephanie Coontz points out in her book Marriage: A History, the idea of marrying for love is a fairly recent phenomenon…perhaps less than 100 years old! Love and sexual faithfulness were less important feature of marriages than were the political and economic interests that were advanced by the union. “Marriages of convenience,” at many times, were actually quite normative at some times.

The bottom line is that there is no “traditional marriage” or marriage “norm” that we can either continue with or change. The fact is, that marriage ideals have always changed with societal changes, and often with changes in technology. Marriage’s definition has always been a social construction, and has always been related to political, social, economic, gender, and racial power. Stewart’s piece demonstrates this basic, yet unacknowledged fact:

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Even more, just like there is so “natural” definition and understanding of marriage–that it is a human construction that can be defined differently, the way we have organized societal obligations along the lines of marriage is also a construction, and so can be constructed differently. That we take the married family to be the social unit upon which our social assumptions are made is something that needs it change; it does not reflect the interests and realities of many Americans’ lives and their desired choices today. We have to stop foreclosing ways to organize one’s economic, reproductive, and sexual needs, as well as the way we wish to form relationships commitment other than heterosexual marriage. Just like heterosexual marriage is not what is always has been defined as, social organization does not have to be what it always has been. We can be creative in the way we organize our lives to meet our needs, if we can only decenter marriage as the central, normative, ideal set of living arrangements.



  1. fourthwavefeminism said,

    You’re totally right (and thanks for the Stewart clip…I’ve been so caught up in election frenzy that I haven’t been watching TDS lately). The idea of “traditional marriage” is pretty ridiculous on all counts. I can’t help but think that the best way around all this mess would be to just require civil unions for any couples that wants legal partner benefits, and marriage would just be something that happened in church if you wanted it with no legal standing. That’s the way it is in some European countries (Germany, for example): everyone can have a civil union–and, in fact, has to have a civil union if they want to be legally recognized as a couple by the country–and then marriage is something you do on your own, a (usually) religious ceremony that has absolutely nothing to do with the government. Of course, that’s a tall order, but a girl can dream, right?

  2. […] Lindabeth comments on Prop 8 and the logical fallacy of “traditional […]

  3. Kara said,

    Yes, since the DAWN OF TIME. Except not in the Bible. There’s a lot of polygamy and icky stuff like that. Remember, as the Bible says, “Do as I say, and not as I say.”

  4. […] also my previous post refuting the claim that marriage has been the same since the “dawn of […]

  5. If you want to know marriage future, take a look at marriage history

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: